Sex no joining or fees No signup free live sexy chats


02-Feb-2020 18:13

To remove the sexual specificity from the notion of marriage makes marriage not a realisation of the bodily difference between male and female that protects and dignifies each, but simply a matter of choice.

This is precisely what many pro-revision advocates themselves argue: that a new definition of marriage would establish marriage as a new thing altogether. J Graff puts it, a change in marriage law would mean that marriage would "ever after stand for sexual choice, forcutting the link between sex and diapers".

Wisely, our politicians don't listen to surveys on that issue (and I agree with them).

They should exercise leadership, not follow opinion.

It is the meaning of marriage that emerges from all human cultures as they reflect on and experience what it is to be male and female. When I ask them about marriage, they almost always indicate that it is for them the beginning of a new family unit open to welcoming children.

The surveys say that Australians want capital punishment.One of them is this: if the Marriage Act changes, this is not the end of the world for me. I am more distressed by our inattention to children in detention, or our national greed problem, than by the possibility that the definition of marriage might be changed.Another is that I stand adamantly against the bullying and vilification of people of minority sexual identities.But simply saying "it's time" doesn't make an argument.



My high school economics teacher loved the saying “There’s no such thing as a free lunch.” It was her go-to response when students asked for pretty much anything.… continue reading »


Read more